Document Type : Articles
1 Assistant Professor, Payame Noor University, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Payame Noor University, Iran.
Commercialization of research results refers to a set of efforts aimed at raising capital and increasing the relationship between the academic and research sector and economic and social sector. The present study intends to identify and rank the factors affecting the commercialization process of research results at Payam-e-Noor University in order to determine the extent of influence of the identified factors. Therefore, this is an applied research in terms of purpose, which studies the factors affecting the process of knowledge commercialization in previous studies, using the confirmatory factor analysis approach. Using fuzzy hierarchical analysis, it was determined that legal, economic, manpower, cultural, structural and political, and communicational and information-related barriers are the first to sixth barriers to the knowledge commercialization in Payam-e-Noor University. Using fuzzy DEMATEL technique, the effectiveness and affectability of factors involved in the process of knowledge commercialization were identified. Accordingly, weak legal framework for supporting idea people at the university, inefficiency and ineffectiveness of the rules and regulations for commercialization, lack of regulation for the apportionment of financial gain from commercialization among scholars, lack of skilled and expert human resources in the universities, lack of facilities and financial resources for research commercialization, and lack of mutual recognition between university and industry had the most affectability. In other words, these are the dependent/outcome variables of the model. On the other hand, inadequate knowledge of the faculty members, poor fund management in the university, weakness of universities in wealth creation, absence of university entrepreneurial missions, the absence of up-to-date and effective idea banks and databases in the universities, and lack of effective communication between students and industry sector’s activists had the most effectiveness. In other words, these variables are the independent/causal variables of the model.
- Abasi, H. (2017). Designing the Model for Commercialization of University Research Using Structural Equation Modeling- Partial Least Squares Method (SEM-PLS). Institute for Trade Staudies and Research, 21(82), 1-21. Retrieved from
- Allen Consulting group. (2004). Building Effective Systems for the Commercialisation of University Research. Business Council of Australia.
- Baldini, N. (2006). The Entrepreneurial University: A Debate (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1097325). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from
- Baycan, T., & Stough, R. R. (2012). Bridging knowledge to commercialization: the good, the bad, and the challenging. The Annals of Regional Science, 50, 367-405.
- Biranvand, A. (2018). Identification of affected factors on the knowledge commercialization in the Iranian integrated universities under MSRT to present practical suggestions: The case of study UI. (Phd Desertation). University of Isfahan, Isfahan.
- Biranvand, A., & Seif, H. (2018). Prioritizing the Effective Factors on Knowledge Commercialization Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2094
- Biranvand, A., Seif, M. H., Safa, S., & Mazloumian, S. (2019). An Investigation into the Effective Factors on the Intention to Commercialization of Knowledge in a University: A Case Study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from
- Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858-868.
- Clayton, P., Feldman, M., & Lowe, N. (2018). Behind the Scenes: Intermediary Organizations that Facilitate Science Commercialization Through Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 104-124. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0133
- Daynich, A., & Wang, Y. (2016). Dynich, A., & Wang, Y. (2016). On the e-commercialization... - Google Scholar. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, (20), 183-188.
- Duch Brown, N., Garcia-Estevez, J., & Parellada-Sabata, M. (2011). Universities and regional economic growth in Spanish regions (Working Papers No. 2011/6). Institut d’Economia de Barcelona (IEB). Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ieb/wpaper/2011-4-doc2011-6.html
- Etzkowitz, H. (1990). The Capitalization of Knowledge: The Decentralization of United States Industrial and Science Policy from Washington to the States. Theory and Society, 19(1), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.2307/657765
- Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
- Goldstein, H., & Renault, C. (2004). Contributions of Universities to Regional Economic Development: A Quasi-experimental Approach. Regional Studies, 38(7), 733-746.
- Hmieleski, K. M., & Powell, E. E. (2018). The Psychological Foundations of University Science Commercialization: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 43-77. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0139
- Irani, F. N. H., hayak, K., & Asetmal, E. K. (2018). Identifying and prioritizing barriers to commercializing researches and innovations in east Azerbaijan University with AHP techniques and providing appropriate strategies. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n2p121
- Ismail, K., Anuar, M. A., Omar, W. Z. W., Aziz, A. A., Seohod, K., & Akhtar, C. S. (2015). Entrepreneurial Intention, Entrepreneurial Orientation of Faculty and Students towards Commercialization. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 349-355.
- Jahed, H. (2011). Explaining of Individual Factors Influencing Commercialization of Research Results; The Case of Islamic Azad University of Science and Research Branch. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 4(1), 1-17. Retrieved from
- Jalili, N., Mousakhani, M., & Behboudi, M. (2011). Nationalized Model For Commercialization, Field Study In Iran. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(4), 118-129.
- Jung, M., Lee, Y., & Lee, H. (2015). Classifying and prioritizing the success and failure factors of technology commercialization of public R&D in South Korea: using classification tree analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(5), 877-898.
- Karlsson, M. (2004). Commercialization of Research Results in the United States – An overview of Federal and Academic Technology Transfer. ITPS, Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:485989
- Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1496174). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from
- Litan, R. E., Mitchell, L., & Reedy, E. J. (2007). Commercializing University Innovations: Alternative Approaches. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 8, 31-57.
- Nelles, J., & Vorley, T. (2010). Constructing an Entrepreneurial Architecture: An Emergent Framework for Studying the Contemporary University Beyond the Entrepreneurial Turn. Innovative Higher Education, 35(3), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-009-9130-3
- Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2003). The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity. Research Policy, 9(32), 1695-1711. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00045-3
- Pazhouhesh Jahromi, A. (2016). Designing and Explanation of a University Researches Results Commercialization Model (Case: Tehran State Technical Colleges) (Phd Desertation). University of Tehran, Tehran.
- Pourezzat, A. A., & Gholipour, A. (2009). Representating Barriers to Academic Entrepreneurship and Knowledge Commercialization at University of Tehran, 2(4), 65-77. Retrieved from http://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12797_en.html
- Rasmussen, E., Moen, ystein, & Gulbrandsen, M. (2006). Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation, 26(4), 518-533.
- Rezaie, M. R., Karimi, M., & Moghadam, J. (2015). Identifying thr technology commercialization challenges and providing a model for alternatives to deal with IT. Journal Management System, (52), 117-130. Retrieved from http://lot.jrl.police.ir/article_12619_en.html
- Roknijo, S. M., Jafari, S. M. B., Yazdani, H. R., & Alvani, S. M. (2017). Study of Barriers for the Successful Implementation of Knowledge Management in Universities and Providing Guidelines. College of Farabi, University of Tehran, 15(2), 445-464.
- Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Transaction Publishers.
- Shane, S. A. (2004). Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Siegel, D. S., & Phan, P. H. (2005). Analyzing the Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education. In University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer (Vol. 16, pp. 1-38). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Stimson, R. J., Stough, R., & Salazar, M. (2009). Leadership and Institutions in Regional Endogenous Development. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Viale, R., & Etzkowitz, H. (2010). The Capitalization of Knowledge: A Triple Helix of University-industry-government. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Wu, W. (2010). Managing and incentivizing research commercialization in Chinese Universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(2), 203-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9116-4
- Zahra, S. A., Kaul, A., & Bolivar, M. T. (2018). Why corporate science commercialization fails: Integrating diverse perspectives. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 156-176. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0132