International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM)

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

Open Access Policy

Language editing services

Scientific Productivity of Leading Countries

Document Type : Articles

Authors

1 Rajagiri College of Social Sciences

2 Keimyung University

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to analyze and compare the scientific productivity of major countries. The related data are collected from Scopus through the open-access portal www.scimagojr.com. Data has been collected on the number of documents and their rank for the top countries. Bibliometric indicators such as Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) and Activity Index (AI) have been used along with a simple percentage. Further, Pearson correlation has been used to compare the rankings. Twenty-four countries have at least 1% of global scientific output in 2018, and all these top countries also ranked in Nature Index 2019 except Indonesia and Malaysia. The top two countries, the United States and China, produced more than 600,000 documents in 2018, with others following distantly. The majority of the top countries are grouped under upper-middle and high income. Fifty percent of the top countries are from Europe. Tremendous improvement in terms of global rank from 1998 to 2018 has been observed for Iran, Indonesia, and Malaysia. All the top countries focus on different disciplines.https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20088302.2022.20.2.8.3

Keywords

References
  1. Chasapi, A., Promponas, V. J., & Ouzounis, C. A. (2020). The bioinformatics wealth of nations. Bioinformatics, 36(9), 2963-2965.
  2. Chinchilla-Rodrıguez, Z.C., Arencibia-Jorge, R., de Moya-Anegon, F., and Corera-Álvarez, E. (2015) Some patterns of Cuban scientific publication in Scopus: The current situation and challenges, Scientometrics, 103(3): 779-794.
  3. Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., Zacca-Gonzalez, G., Vargas-Quesada, B., & Moya-Anegon, F. (2015). Latin American scientific output in Public Health: combined analysis using bibliometric, socioeconomic and health indicators. Scientometrics, 102(1): 609-628.
  4. Daneshmand, A.R., Forouzandeh, H., Azadi, M., and Cheraghzadeh, D. S. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of hematological research productivity among five Islamic countries during 1996 to 2013 (a 17-years period). Iran. J. Blood Cancer, 7: 67-74.
  5. Elango, B. (2019a). A bibliometric analysis of literature on engineering research among BRIC countries, Collection and Curation, 38: 9-14.
  6. Elango, B. (2019b). Calculation errors in bibliometrics: the case of CAGR, COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 13: 331-337.
  7. Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., and Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses, The FASEB journal, 22: 338-342.
  8. Frame, J.D. (1977). Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean, Interciencia, 2: 143-148.
  9. Gaillard, J. (2010). Measuring research and development in developing countries: main characteristics and implications for the Frascati manual. Science, Technology and Society, 15(1), 77-111.
  10. Gonzalez-Brambila, C. N., Reyes-Gonzalez, L., Veloso, F., & Perez-Angon, M. A. (2016). The scientific impact of developing nations. PLoS One, 11(3): e0151328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151328
  11. Guan, J. and Ma, N. (2004). A comparative study of research performance in computer science. Scientometrics, 61(3): 339–359.
  12. Guilera, G., Barrios, M., & Gomez-Benito, J. (2013). Meta-analysis in psychology: a bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 94(3): 943-954.
  13. Hinrichs, D. L., Debus, E. S., & Grundmann, R. T. (2019). Surgical publication activity in the English literature over a 10‐year interval. BJS open, doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50172
  14. Jazayeri, S. B., Alavi, A., & Rahimi-Movaghar, V. (2012). Situation of medical sciences in 50 top countries from 1996 to 2010-based on quality and quantity of publications. Acta Medica Iranica, 273-278.
  15. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997): 311-316.
  16. Lin, G., Hu, Z., & Hou, H. (2018). Research preferences of the G20 countries: a bibliometrics and visualization analysis. Current Science, 115(8): 1477-1485.
  17. Makri, A. (2018). Pakistan and Egypt had highest rises in research output in 2018. Nature, doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07841-9.
  18. May, R. M. (1997). The scientific wealth of nations. Science, 275(5301): 793-796.
  19. McAllister, P. R., & Wagner, D. A. (1981). Relationship between R&D expenditures and publication output for US colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education, 15(1): 3-30.
  20. Medina, F. (2015). The output of researchers in Morocco compared to some North African countries from 1996 to 2012, and its relationship to governmental major decisions on higher education and scientific research, Scientometrics, 105: 367-384.
  21. Moed, H. F. (2006). Bibliometric rankings of world universities (CWTS Report 2006-1). Leiden: Leiden University.
  22. Moed, H. F., Markusova, V., & Akoev, M. (2018). Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. Scientometrics, 116(2): 1153-1180.
  23. Nature Index. 2019. 2019 tables: Countries/territories ()
  24. Nishy, P., Salini, C. P., Mini, S., & Vishnumaya, R. S. (2014). A bibliometric evaluation of organic chemistry research in India. Annals of Library & Information Studies, 61(4): 332-342.
  25. OECD. 2020. Gross domestic spending on R&D ()
  26. Rousseau, S., & Rousseau, R. (1998). The scientific wealth of European nations: Taking effectiveness into account. Scientometrics, 42(1), 75-87.
  27. Sangam, S. L., Arali, U., Patil, C. G., & Megeri, M. N. (2013). Scientometrics analysis of Genetics Literature. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 7(2): 173-190.
  28. Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9(5-6): 281-291.
  29. Siddiqi, A., Stoppani, J., Anadon, L. D., & Narayanamurti, V. (2016). Scientific wealth in Middle East and North Africa: Productivity, indigeneity, and specialty in 1981–2013. PloS one, 11(11), e0164500.
  30. Wang, X., Liu, D., Ding, K., & Wang, X. (2012). Science funding and research output: a study on 10 countries. Scientometrics, 91(2): 591-599.
  31. White, Karen. (2019). Publications Output: U.S. Trends and International Comparisons. ()
  32. Yahya Asiri, F., Kruger, E., & Tennant, M. (2020). Global Dental Publications in PubMed Databases between 2009 and 2019: A Bibliometric Analysis. Molecules, 25(20): 1-14.
  33. Zacca-Gonzalez, G., Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., and de Moya-Anegon, F. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of regional Latin America’s scientific output in public health through SCImago journal & country rank, BMC Public Health, 14: 632. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-632
International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM)
Volume 20, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
April 2022
Pages 127-143
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 19 February 2021
  • Revise Date: 25 March 2023
  • Accept Date: 03 December 2022
  • First Publish Date: 03 December 2022
Share
How to cite
Statistics