International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM)

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

Open Access Policy

Language editing services

Investigating the Status of Intra-Disciplinary and Extra-Disciplinary Relationships of the Physiotherapy Articles of Iran Indexed In the Web of Science during 2013-2017

Document Type : Articles

Authors

1 School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Physiotherapy is an interdisciplinary field. Accordingly, to grow and develop itself, in addition to intra-disciplinary relationships, it needs significant extra-disciplinary relationships. The present study investigates intra-disciplinary, and extra-disciplinary relationships in physiotherapy articles of Iran indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) from 2013 to 2017. In this study, to answer the research questions, the methods of content analysis, citation analysis, and scientometric approach were used. The statistical population included 210 articles on Iran in physiotherapy indexed on the WoS from 2013 to 2017. The trend of publishing 210 articles on Iran in physiotherapy has been growing from 2013 to 2017, with some neglect. Out of 7058 references in the 210 articles, the share of intra-disciplinary and extra-disciplinary references is 75% and 46%, respectively. The examined articles have been cited in 758 articles, of which 81.14% were extra-disciplinary citations, and 18.86% were intra-disciplinary citations. In the research period, physiotherapy articles of Iran in the research period have benefited from intra-disciplinary relationships more than extra-disciplinary ones. Relationships between articles citing the examined articles were more than other scientific fields and extra-disciplinary.https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20088302.2022.20.2.21.6

Keywords

References
  1. Alberta Health Services. (2012). Rehabilitation conceptual framework. In Alberta Health Services.
  2. Asadzandi, S., Shahbodaghi, A., Sajjadi, S., Kamkarhaghighi, M., & Hemmat, M. (2013). A scientometric study of media literacy literature based on Scopus record through 2011. Archives of Advances in Biosciences, 4(1).
  3. Benton, A. D., & Benton, D. C. (2018). Evolution of physiotherapy scholarship: A comparative bibliometric analysis of two decades of English published work. Physiotherapy Research International, e1760.
  4. Bergmann, T., Dale, R., Sattari, N., Heit, E., & Bhat, H. S. (2017). The interdisciplinarity of collaborations in Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science, 41(5), 1412–1418.
  5. Bindal, V. D. (2018). Textbook of Kinesiology. Jaypee Brothers,Medical Publishers Pvt. Limited. https://books.google.com/books?id=Ha52DwAAQBAJ
  6. Burniston, J., Eftekhari, F., Hrabi, S., Worsley, R., & Dean, E. (2012). Health behaviour change and lifestyle-related condition prevalence: Comparison of two epochs based on systematic review of the physical therapy literature. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal, 30(2), 44–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hkpj.2012.07.001
  7. Campbell, S. K. (2017). Physical therapy: history of physical therapy. In Encyclopædia Britannica Inc.
  8. Casarotto, R. A., de Andrade, C. R. F., Tanaka, C., Lancman, S., & Oliver, F. C. (2016). Physical therapy, speech therapy and occupational therapy: past, present and future. Revista de Medicina, 95(spe2), 29–34.
  9. Chalak, A. M., Yaminfirooz, M., & Riahi, A. (n.d.). Qom Univ Med Sci J 2018 June.
  10. Cleather, J. M. (2008). Physiotherapy-leadership and opportunities. Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada, 60(4), 318–340. https://doi.org/10.3138/physio.60.4.318
  11. Cohen, H. S. (1999). Neuroscience for rehabilitation (Vol. 2). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia, PA.
  12. Farhud, D. D. (2015). Impact of Lifestyle on Health. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 44(11), 1442–1444. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26744700
  13. Garfield, E. (1989a). Citation &social behavior: Raymond G, McInnis and Dal Sims explore David Riesman The Lonely Crowd. The Essays of an Information Scientist. http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v12p238y1989.pdf
  14. Garfield, E. (1989b). Citation behavior-an aid or a hindrance to information-retrieval. The Essays of an Information Scientist; INST SCI INFORM INC 3501 MARKET ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104. http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v12p123y1989.pdf
  15. Ghanavizchian, G., Horri, A., & Ghaebi, A. (2006). Identifying the trans-disciplinary relation models of the Iranian library and information science journal articles (1994-2004). JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION SPRING-SUMMER, 36(1–2), 17–36.
  16. Hariri, N., & Shekofteh, M. (2013). The scientific map of medicine in Iran: Category co-citation analysis. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 18(2), 79–94.
  17. Horri, A., & Shahbodaghi, A. (2008). Citation styles for scientific writings: International guidelines. In Tehran University (2nd ed.).
  18. Jamali, H. R., Azadi-Ahmadabadi, G., & Asadi, S. (2018). Interdisciplinary relations of converging technologies: Nano–Bio–Info–Cogno (NBIC). Scientometrics, 116(2), 1055–1073.
  19. Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Börner, K. (2015). Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact. Plos One, 10(3), e0122565.
  20. mohammadi F, shekofteh M, kazerani M. (2020). Iran’s Scientific Publications in the Field of Endocrinology and Metabolism in the Web of Science: A Scientometric Analysis. Iranian. Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 22(2).
  21. Momsen, A.-M., Rasmussen, J. O., Nielsen, C. V., Iversen, M. D., & Lund, H. (2012). Multidisciplinary team care in rehabilitation: an overview of reviews. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(11), 901–912.
  22. Okhovati, M., Sadeghi, H., & Shojaei, R. (2013). Analysis of Medical Education Output in Web of Science Database. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 10(2), 200–210.
  23. Pormomeni, A. (2012). Basic of Rehabilitation. Isfahan Medical Scinces University.
  24. Schary, D. P., & Cardinal, B. J. (2015). Interdisciplinary and Intradisciplinary Research and Teaching in Kinesiology: Continuing the Conversation. Quest, 67(2), 173–184.
  25. Sedighi, M. (2013). Interdisciplinary relations in some high‐priority fields of science and technology. Library Review.
  26. The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. (2019). What is physiotherapy? In The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy.
  27. Van den Besselaar, P., & Heimeriks, G. (2001). Disciplinary, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary: Concepts and indicators. ISSI, 705–716.
  28. Vinkler, P. (1998). Comparative investigation of frequency and strength of motives toward referencing. The reference threshold model. Scientometrics, 43(1), 107–127.
  29. Wiles, L., Matricciani, L., Williams, M., & Olds, T. (2012). Sixty-five years of Physical Therapy: bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1945 through 2010. Physical Therapy, 92(4), 493–506.
  30. World Confederation for Physical Therapy. (2019). What is physical therapy. In World Confederation for Physical Therapy.
  31. World Health Organization. (2011). Rehabilitation. In World report on disability (pp. 93–133). Geneva: World Health Organization.
International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM)
Volume 20, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
April 2022
Pages 347-358
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 11 May 2021
  • Revise Date: 29 September 2023
  • Accept Date: 03 December 2022
Share
How to cite
Statistics