Document Type : Articles

Authors

1 Associate Prof. in Librarianship and Medical Information Department, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. candidate of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Health Management and Information Science, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

This research aimed to specify research trends in Library and Information Science (LIS) from 2011 to 2020 and hot papers in this field from July 2020 to July 2021 in the Web of Science (WoS) database. This research was of the type applied, scientometric, and descriptive. The study population was all articles in the field of LIS from 2011 to July 2021. The WoS database was used to collect data. To determine the research trend in the field of LIS, the results were limited to 2011-2020, and to determine the hot papers, this period was limited to July 2020 to July 2021. The obtained data were analyzed using the word co-occurrence technique and social network analysis. UCINET, NetDraw, and VOSviewer software were used to draw scientific maps and identify central subjects and people. "Social media" with 259 and "qualitative" with 53 were the keywords with the highest and lowest frequencies, respectively. Library and emerging technologies (106), citation analysis, scientometrics and webometrics (58), electronic information, information security, and protection (56) were three significant topic clusters in the studied area. The results indicated that the research topics in LIS have changed and evolved in the last ten years despite new and up-to-date topics.

Keywords

Araujo, R. F. & Oliveira, M. (2017). Technological basis for information science in Brazil: A scientometric study. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 231-241. Retrieved from http://www.qqml.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/377
Borgman, C. L. (2003). From gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: Access to information in the networked world. Mit Press.
Bowker, L. (2018). Corpus linguistics is not just for linguists: Considering the potential of computerbased corpus methods for library and information science research. Library Hi Tech, 36(2), 358-371. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-2017-0271
Chang, Y. W., Huang, M. H. & Lin, C. W. (2015). Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2071-2087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1762-8
Chohdary, I. N., Asghar, M. B. & Alshaheer, M. A. (2021). Predicting LIS scholarly research directions in the era of data science. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 6328. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6328
Clarivate (2022). Essential science indicators help. Clarivate Analytics. Retrieved from http://esi.help.clarivate.com/Content/hot-paper-thresholds.htm
Coccia, M. (2021). Evolution and structure of research fields driven by crises and environmental threats: The COVID-19 research. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9405-9429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04172-x
Elia, E. F. & Sife, A. S. (2018). Analysis of top cited papers in library and information science that have stood the test of time. University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal, 13(1), 54-68. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Reza/Downloads/ajol-file-journals_164_articles_184589_submission_proof_184589-1957-469662-1-10-20190314.pdf
Figuerola, C. G., García Marco, F. J. & Pinto, M. (2017). Mapping the evolution of library and information science (1978–2014) using topic modeling on LISA. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1507-1535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2432-9
Hou, J., Yang, X. & Chen, C. (2018). Emerging trends and new developments in information science: A document co-citation analysis (2009-2016). Scientometrics, 115(2), 869-892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2695-9
Hu, Z. & Wu, Y. (2018). A probe into causes of non-citation based on survey data. Social Science Information, 57(1), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417742537
Järvelin, K. & Vakkari, P. (2022). LIS research across 50 years: Content analysis of journal articles. Journal of Documentation, 78(2), 65-88. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2021-0062
Li, P., Yang, G. & Wang, C. (2019). Visual topical analysis of library and information science. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1753-1791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03239-0
Ma, J. & Lund, B. (2020). The evolution of LIS research topics and methods from 2006 to 2018: A content analysis. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), e241. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.241
Miyata, Y., Ishita, E., Yang, F., Yamamoto, M., Iwase, A. & Kurata, K. (2020). Knowledge structure transition in library and information science: Topic modeling and visualization. Scientometrics, 125(1), 665-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03657-5
Noruzi, A. (2017). Hot papers in library and information science from the point of view of research methods. Webology, 14(2), 1-5. Retrieved from https://www.webology.org/data-cms/articles/20200515031920pmeditorial24.pdf
Oltmann, S. M. (2009). Information access: Toward a more robust conceptualization. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2009.1450460274
Onyancha, O. B. (2018). Forty-five years of LIS research evolution, 1971-2015: An informetrics study of the author-supplied keywords. Publishing Research Quarterly, 34(3), 456-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-018-9590-3
Papić, A. & Buhin, M. (2019, May). Mapping the hot topics in library and information science field in period 2015-2018 Year. In 2019 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) (pp. 508-513). IEEE.
Saracevic, T. (2000). Digital library evaluation: Toward evolution of concepts. Library Trends, 49(2), 350-369. Retrieved from https://tefkos.comminfo.rutgers.edu/Courses/Zadar/Readings/Saracevic%20eval%20LibraryTrends%202000.pdf
Selvavinayagam, A., Muthu, M. & Boopalan, E. (2018). Scientometrics, techniques, sources and their key points to analysis of LIS research: An overview. International Journal of Science and Technology, 8(1), 10-19. Retrieved from http://ijst.co.in/papers/vol8issue1/ijst_180303.pdf
Song, Y., Wei, K., Yang, S., Shu, F. & Qiu, J. (2020). Analysis on the research progress of library and information science since the new century. Library Hi Tech, 41(4), 1145-1157.  https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-06-2020-0126
Taşkın, Z. (2021). Forecasting the future of library and information science and its sub-fields. Scientometrics, 126(2), 1527-1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03800-2
Tuomaala, O., Järvelin, K. & Vakkari, P. (2014). Evolution of library and information science, 1965–2005: Content analysis of journal articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(7), 1446-1462. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23034
Vakkari, P. (1994). Library and information science: Its content and scope. In Advances in librarianship, Vol. 18 (pp. 1-55). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0065-2830(1994)0000018003
Wang, X., Wang, H. & Huang, H. (2021). Evolutionary exploration and comparative analysis of the research topic networks in information disciplines. Scientometrics, 126(6), 4991-5017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03963-6
 
Webster, J. & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii. Retrieved from https://web.njit.edu/~egan/Writing_A_Literature_Review.pdf