Global Research Trends in Research Data Management (RDM) – A Scientometric View

Sheriff Naseema, Rathinam Sevukan

Abstract


The study focuses on Research Data Management (RDM), aiming to demonstrate how RDM is evolving globally. It provides a systematic mapping of the current literature to aid in identifying core coverage and reflecting on potential trends using the scientometric technique. For detailed thematic analysis, performance analysis, network representation, science mapping, and scientific collaboration, this study used bibliometric tools such as the R package Biblioshiny, ScientoPy, and VOSviewer. Two premier indexing databases, SCOPUS and Web of Science, which extensively cover RDM literature, are appropriately considered. Furthermore, all retrieved documents are refined by language, document type, and irrelevant keywords for practical analysis. This study covers the Research Data Management (RDM) literature from 1926 to 2020, with 6263 documents published from 1666 sources and 15,545 authors. The most common domains discovered in RDM research are Computer Science, Library and Information Science. RDM is primarily familiar and cultivated in nations such as the United States, China, the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, and Australia are pioneers in RDM research. The findings are vital for researchers working on RDM projects and policy formulation. This research helps to identify the literature's strengths and potential gaps. This secondary data contributes significantly to the scientific landscape in scientific production, network architecture, source clustering, and international collaboration, the evolution of dominant subjects and countries, and science mapping of productive word frequency.

https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20088302.2022.20.4.8.7


Keywords


Research Data Management; RDM; Scientopy; VOSviewer; Science Mapping, Scientometrics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alonso, J. M., Castiello, C., & Mencar, C. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of the explainable artificial intelligence research field. Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 853). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91473-2_1

Anilkumar, N. (2018). Research Data Management in India: A Pilot Study. EPJ Web of Conferences, 186, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818603002

Ashiq, M., Usmani, M. H., & Naeem, M. (2020). A systematic literature review on research data management practices and services. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-07-2020-0103

Bangani, S., & Moyo, M. (2019). Data sharing practices among researchers at south african universities. Data Science Journal, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-028

Biancone, P. Pietro, Saiti, B., Petricean, D., & Chmet, F. (2020). The bibliometric analysis of Islamic banking and finance. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(10), 2069–2086. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2020-0235

Bibliometrix R Package. (n.d.). Retrieved December 23, 2020, from https://www.bibliometrix.org/index.html

Bunkar, A. R., & Bhatt, D. D. (2020). Perception of Researchers & Academicians of Parul University towards Research Data Management System & Role of Library: A Study. DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 40(3), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.3.15302

Chawinga, W. D., & Zinn, S. (2020a). Research data management at an African medical university: Implications for academic librarianship. JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 46(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102161

Chawinga, W. D., & Zinn, S. (2020b). Research Data Management in Universities: A Comparative Study from the Perspectives of Librarians and Management. International Information and Library Review, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2020.1793448

Cho, J. (2019). Study of Asian RDR based on re3data. Electronic Library, 37(2), 302–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-01-2019-0016

Choi, M. S., & Lee, S. (2020). Research data management status of science and technology research institutes in Korea. Data Science Journal. Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/DSJ-2020-029

Cox, A. M., & Tam, W. W. T. (2018). A critical analysis of lifecycle models of the research process and research data management. ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 70(2), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-11-2017-0251

Cyberinfrastructure Council. (2007). C yberinfrastruCture V ision for 21 st C entury D isCoVery. National Science Foundation, (March).

Fusco, F., Marsilio, M., & Guglielmetti, C. (2020). Co-production in health policy and management: A comprehensive bibliometric review. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05241-2

Gunjal, B., & Gaitanou, P. (2017). Research Data Management: A proposed framework to boost research in Higher Educational Institutes. IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 12. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq12

Janik, A., Ryszko, A., & Szafraniec, M. (2020). Scientific landscape of smart and sustainable cities literature: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030779

Joo, S., & Peters, C. (2020). User needs assessment for research data services in a research university. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(3), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000619856073

Koltay, T. (2017). Research 2.0 and Research Data Services in academic and research libraries: priority issues. LIBRARY MANAGEMENT, 38(6–7, SI), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-11-2016-0082

Kun, W., Tong, L., & Xiaodan, X. (2019). Application of Big Data Technology in Scientific Research Data Management of Military Enterprises. In Procedia Computer Science (Vol. 147, pp. 556–561). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.221

Late, E., & Kekalainen, J. (2020). Use and users of a social science research data archive. PLOS ONE, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233455

Liao, Y. P., & Ma, T. J. (2018). Institutional repositories: a bibliometric study of the social sciences citation index (SSCI). Electronic Library, 36(3), 504–517. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-09-2017-0192

Liu, G., Zotoo, I. K., & Su, W. (2020). Research data management policies in USA, UK and Australia universities: An online survey. MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE, 25(2), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol25no2.2

Liu, H., Peng, K., Li, W., & Cao, Y. (2019). Investigation on the trends and characteristics of articles on submerged macrophytes: perception from bibliometrics between 1991 and 2018. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 34(1), 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2019.1676319

Liu, X., & Ding, N. (2016). Research data management in universities of central China: Practices at Wuhan University Library. Electronic Library, 34(5), 808–822. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-04-2015-0063

Marlina, E., & Purwandari, B. (2019). Strategy for research data management services in Indonesia. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 788–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.184

Mushi, G. E., Pienaar, H., & Deventer, M. van. (2020). Identifying and implementing relevant research data management services for the library at the university of dodoma, Tanzania. Data Science Journal, 19(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-001

Onyancha, O. B. (2016). Open Research Data in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Bibliometric Study Using the Data Citation Index. PUBLISHING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 32(3), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9463-6

Payal, Awasthi, S., & Tripathi, M. (2019). A selective review of literature on research data management in academic libraries. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 39(6), 338–345. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.06.14451

Redkina, N. S. (2019). Current Trends in Research Data Management. SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, 46(2), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688219020035

Roche, D. G., Granados, M., Austin, C. C., Wilson, S., Mitchell, G. M., Smith, P. A., … Bennett, J. R. (2020). Open government data and environmental science: a federal Canadian perspective. Facets, 5(1), 942–962. https://doi.org/10.1139/FACETS-2020-0008

Ruiz-Rosero, J., Ramirez-Gonzalez, G., Williams, J. M., Liu, H., Khanna, R., & Pisharody, G. (2017). Internet of things: A scientometric review. Symmetry, 9(12), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9120301

Saeed, S., & Ali, P. M. N. (2019). Research Data Management and Data Sharing among Research Scholars of Life Sciences and Social Sciences. DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 39(6), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.6.14997

Secinaro, S., Brescia, V., Calandra, D., & Biancone, P. (2020). Employing bibliometric analysis to identify suitable business models for electric cars. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121503

Surkis, A., & Read, K. (2015). Research data management. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103(3), 154–156. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.011

Team, R. C. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/

Tripathi M, Chand M, Sonkar, et al. (2017b). A brief assessment of researchers’ perceptions towards research data in India. IFLA Journal, 43(1), 22–39.

Tripathi, M., Shukla, A., & Sonker, S. K. (2017a). Research data management practices in university libraries: A study. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 37(6), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.37.6.11336

Penn State University Libraries (2014), “What is data management?”, Pennsylvania State University Libraries, State College, PA, available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20160304192954/http://www.libraries.psu.edu/psul/pubcur/what_is_dm.html (accessed 25 January 2021).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



E-ISSN: 2008-8310

   ISSN: 2008-8302  

SCImago Journal & Country Rank