Survival of the Print Book! The Falsifiability Approach towards an Inductive Belief

Dariush Alimohammadi

Abstract


Looks at the historical and philosophical roots of the reasoning and defines the induction as the most popular style of reasoning. Discusses the problem of induction and its complexities through an example. Explains one of the solutions provided for the problem of induction; i.e. the falsifiability theory. Defines the falsifiability theory and concentrates on an ongoing argument among information professionals. Survival of the print book, as an inductive belief, is what this article tries to analyze and gauge. Through an all-inclusive literature review, viewpoints of the pros and cons of this inductive belief are discussed; and much number of evidences is provided for the death of the print book. Concludes that the survival of the print book belief is falsified and liberal information professionals should be trained to press e-book publishers to develop their products.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, N., &Gibb, F. (2008a). Students' attitudes towards e-books in a Scottish Higher ‎Education Institute: Part 1. Library Review, 57 (8), 593-605.‎

Abdullah, N., &Gibb, F. (2008b). Students' attitudes towards e-books in a Scottish Higher ‎Education Institute: Part 2. Library Review, 57 (9), 676-689.‎

AbediShahroodi, A. (1988). Sense and induction in Islamic philosophy.KeyhaneAndishe,20, ‎‎27-38.‎

AbediShahroodi, A. (1989). Types of induction and its rational and religious ‎causes.KeyhaneAndishe,23, 30-44.‎

Abram, S. (2010a). Books and e-books: As different as night and day. Information Outlook, ‎‎14 (3), 32-34.‎

Abram, S. (2010b). P-books vs. e-books: Death match? Information Outlook, 14 (6), 30-32.‎

Ackermann, R. (1967). Philosophy of science: An introduction.New York: Pegasus.‎

Afzali, J. (2008). Induction from the comparative viewpoint.Ma'refateFalsafi, 5 (3), 117-144.‎

Ahmadi, A. (1999). Sensitive experience and its relation to the ‎induction.KheradnameyeSadra, 16, 10-19.‎

Albanese, A. (2012). New reports chart the rise of e-books. Publishers Weekly, 259 (15), 6-7.‎

Alizadeh, A. (2011). Meanland: The death of the book, and other utopian fantasies. Retrieved ‎from http://overland.org.au/blogs/meanland-blog/2011/06/meanland-the-death-of-the-‎book-and-other-utopian-fantasies/‎

Anderson, B. (2009). E-book growth.Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 28 (1/2), 74-‎‎76.‎

Anuradha, K.T., &Usha, H.S. (2006).Use of e-books in an academic and research ‎environment: A case study from the Indian Institute of Science. Program: Electronic ‎Library and Information Systems, 40 (1), 48-62.‎

Beheshti, A. (1998). The difference between experience and induction.KalameEslami, 7 (3), ‎‎14-23.‎

Berg, S.A., Hoffmann, K., & Dawson, D. (2010). Not on the same page: Undergraduates' ‎information retrieval in electronic and print books. The Journal of Academic ‎Librarianship, 36 (6), 518-525.‎

Best, R.D. (2008). The University of Pittsburgh study in an electronic environment: Have e-‎books changed usage patterns of monographs?Acquisitions Librarian, 19 (3/4), 311-323.‎

Bieman, J., Ortega, L., & Rupp-Serrano, K. (2010).E-book usage in pure and applied ‎sciences.Science and Technology Libraries, 29 (1/2), 69-91.‎

BonJour, L. (1998). In defense of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.‎

Bosch, D. (2012). Print vs. technology: Is the printed book dying a slow death?Retrieved from ‎http://www.wabi.tv/news/30268/print-vs-technology-is-the-printed-book-dying-a-slow-‎death.‎

Brookman, J.B. (2011). The death of the printed word.Retrieved from ‎http://www.thecorsaironline.com/uncategorized/2011/12/08/the-death-of-the-printed-‎word/.‎

Bruccoli, M.J. (2007). The end of book and the death of libraries.Against the Grain, 19 (1), ‎‎70-74.‎

Bunkell, J., &Dyas-Correia, S. (2009). E-books vs. print: Which is the better value? Serials ‎Librarian, 56 (1/4), 215-219.‎

Bury, L. (2009). Knight rejects positive e-book study findings.Bookseller,5400, 7.‎

Camacho, L., &Spackman, A. (2011).Transitioning to e-books: Usage and attitudes among ‎business faculty.Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship, 16 (1), 33-45.‎

Carlock, D.M., & Perry, A.M. (2008).Exploring faculty experiences with e-books: A focus ‎group.Library Hi Tech, 26 (2), 44-54.‎

Cheong, C.F., & Tuan, N.C. (2011). What users want and what users do in E-books: Findings ‎of a study on use of e-books from NTU library.Singapore Journal of Library and ‎Information Management, 40, 1-32.‎

Coldewey, D. (2010). Its futurists versus consumers as the death of the book is prophesied. ‎Retrieved from http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/07/its-futurists-versus-consumers-as-the-‎death-of-the-book-is-prophesied/.‎

Croft, R., &Davis, C. (2010). E-books revisited: Surveying student E-book usage in a ‎distributed learning academic library 6 years later. Journal of Library Administration, 50 ‎‎(5/6), 543-569.‎

Death of the printed book?(2010). Retrieved from ‎http://philosophymatrix.com/2010/09/30/death-of-the-printed-book/‎

Denny, N. (2010). Orion chief executive: Don't get distracted by e-books. Bookseller, 5421, 8.‎

Ebrary’sGlobal Student E-book Survey Results Available. (2008). Library Hi Tech News, 25 ‎‎(8/9), 28.‎

Estelle, L., & Woodward, H. (2009). The National e-Books observatory project: Examining ‎student behaviors and usage.Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 21 (2), 172-‎‎177.‎

FanaieAshkevari, M. (1994).Induction and experience.Ma'refat, 3 (3), 22-28.‎

FanaieAshkevari, M. (1995).Induction and experience.Ma'refat , 3 (4), 44-52.‎

Fitzpatrick, M. (2010). Comics drive growing Japanese e-book market. Publishers Weekly, 257 ‎‎(4), 11-12.‎

Fitzpatrick, M. (2011). Japan "Rejecting E-books", claims report. Bookseller,5507, 8.‎

Foasberg, N.M. (2011). Adoption of e-Book readers among college students: A survey. ‎Information Technology and Libraries, 30 (3), 108-128.‎

Folb, B.L., Wessel, C.B., &Czechowski, L.J. (2011). Clinical and academic use of electronic ‎and print books: The health sciences library system e-book study at the University of ‎Pittsburgh. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 99 (3), 218-228.‎

Foote, J.B., & Rupp-Serrano, K. (2010).Exploring e-book usage among faculty and graduate ‎students in the geosciences: Results of a small survey and focus group approach.Science ‎and Technology Libraries, 29 (3), 216-234.‎

Fulford, R. (2011). Death of the book: Long live e-books. Retrieved from ‎http://arts.nationalpost.com/2011/04/26/death-of-the-book-long-live-e-books/.‎

GandomiNasrabadi, R. (1998a). The new puzzle of induction from the viewpoint of Nelson ‎Goodman.KeyhaneAndishe,78, 131-147.‎

GandomiNasrabadi, R. (1998b). The new puzzle of induction from the viewpoint of Nelson ‎Goodman.KeyhaneAndishe, 79, 135-159.‎

Global Faculty E-book Survey Results Now Available from Ebrary. (2008). Library Hi Tech ‎News, 25 (1), 43.‎

Grigson, A. (2009). Evaluating business models for e-books through usage data analysis: A ‎case study from the University of Westminster.Journal of Electronic Resources ‎Librarianship, 21 (1), 62-74.‎

Grudzien, P., & Casey, A.M. (2008). Do off-campus students use e-books? Journal of Library ‎Administration, 48 (3/4), 455-466.‎

Gutas, D. (2001). Intuition and thinking: The evolving structure of Avicenna's epistemology. ‎In R. Wisnovsky (Ed.)Aspects of Avicenna (1-39). Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener Pub.‎

HadaviTehrani, M.M. (1991a). Inductive logic criticized. KeyhaneAndishe,37, 61-70.‎

HadaviTehrani, M.M. (1991b). The problem of induction from the viewpoint of shahid ‎Sadr.KeyhaneAndishe,36, 130-147.‎

Haghghi, A. (2002). Introduction to experimental sciences methodology: Induction and ‎allegory from the viewpoint of Muslim logistics. PazhuheshhayeFalsafi – Kalami,11, 158-‎‎167.‎

Hansson, J. (2011). Viewpoint: Considering e-books. Scandinavian Public Library Quarterly, ‎‎44 (4), 14-15.‎

Hawkins, D.T. (2002). Electronic books: Reports of their death have been exaggerated. ‎Online, 26 (4), 42-48.‎

Hernon, P., Hopper, R., Leach, M.R., Saunders, L.L., & Zhang, J. (2007). E-book use by ‎students: Undergraduates in economics, literature, and nursing. Journal of Academic ‎Librarianship, 33 (1), 3-13.‎

High Growth Expected in E-books. (2009). Research Information,40, 5.‎

Hoseth, A., &McLure, M. (2012).Perspectives on e-books from instructors and students in the ‎social sciences.Reference and User Services Quarterly, 51 (3), 278-288.‎

Ismail, R., &Zainab, A.N. (2005). The pattern of e-book use amongst undergraduates in ‎Malaysia: A case of to know is to use. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information ‎Science, 10 (2), 1-23.‎

Jackson, M.L., & Holley, B. (2011).The evolving role of E-books at the University of ‎Alabama Libraries.Serials Librarian, 61 (2), 200-206.‎

Jalali, G. (1997). Induction logic from the viewpoint of shahid Sadr.Howzeh, 14 (1/2), 276-‎‎321.‎

Kabir, Y. (2007). ShahidSadr and the problem of induction.Falsafeh, 35 (4), 25-45.‎

Kheirollahi, M.A. (2007). How to discover religious verdicts through ‎induction.MajalleyeFeghhvaMabaniyeHoghoogh, 3 (4), 59-72.‎

KhosroPanah, A. (2001). Logic of scientific induction.KalameEslami, 10 (1), 72-89.‎

KhosroPanah, A. (2004). Inductive logic from the viewpoint of shahid Sadr.Zehn,18.‎

Kimball, R., Ives, G., & Jackson, K. (2010).Comparative usage of science e-book and print ‎collections at Texas A&M University Libraries.Collection Management, 35 (1), 15-28.‎

Langston, M. (2003). The California State University e-book pilot project: Implications for ‎cooperative collection development.Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical ‎Services, 27 (1), 19-32.‎

Letchumanan, M., &Tarmizi, R.A. (2011a).E-book utilization among mathematics students of ‎Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM).Library Hi Tech, 29 (1), 109-121.‎

Letchumanan, M., &Tarmizi, R.A. (2011b).Assessing the intention to use e-book among ‎engineering undergraduates in Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.Library Hi Tech, 29 ‎‎(3), 512-528.‎

Lewis, S. (2008). E-book discovery and use behavior is complex. Evidence Based Library and ‎Information Practice, 3 (2), 38-41.‎

Littman, J., &Connaway, L.S. (2004).A circulation analysis of print books and e-books in an ‎academic research library.Library Resources and Technical Services, 48 (4), 256-262.‎

MacManus, R. (2010). 5 ways that paper books are better than e-books. Retrieved from ‎http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/5_ways_that_paper_books_are_better_than_ebooks.php.‎

Maynard, S. (2010). The impact of e-books on young children's reading habits.Publishing ‎Research Quarterly, 26 (4), 236-248.‎

McKnight, C., Dearnley, J.,& Morris, A. (2008).Making e-books available through public ‎libraries: Some user reactions.Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 40 (1), ‎‎31-43.‎

Milliot, J. (2010). Consumers show growing satisfaction with e-books. Publishers Weekly, 257 ‎‎(15), 5.‎

Mims, C. (2010a). Predicting the death of print.Retrieved from ‎http://www.technologyreview.com/view/420329/predicting-the-death-of-print/.‎

Mims, C. (2010b). The death of the book has been greatly exaggerated. Retrieved from ‎http://www.technologyreview.com/view/420881/the-death-of-the-book-has-been-greatly/.‎

Mousavi, M.S. (2003). From induction to the theory: A mechanism. Rahnemoon,3-4, 7-34.‎

Nabati, F. (2006).A comparison between inference to the best explanation and ‎conjecture.HekmateSinavi, 10 (35), 8-30.‎

Nariani, R. (2009). E-books in the sciences: If we buy it will they use it? Issues in Science and ‎Technology Librarianship,59.Retrieved from ‎http://pi.library.yorku.ca/dspace/handle/10315/2905‎

Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Clark, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H.R., &Ollé, C. (2008). UK ‎scholarly e-book usage: A landmark survey. Aslib Proceedings, 60 (4), 311-334.‎

Pattillo, G. (2008). Student e-book survey results.College and Research Libraries News, 69 ‎‎(8), 512.‎

Pellé, A. (2009). The slow rise of e-books.Research Information,44, 13-14.‎

Rabbani Golpayegani, A. (1994). Inductive logic and the theory of ‎probability.MajalleyeKalam, 3 (4), 31-44.‎

Rabbani Golpayegani, A. (1995). Bertrand Arthur William Russell and the theoretical non-‎justifiability of induction.MajalleyeKalam, 4 (2), 12-23.‎

Ramaiah, C.K. (2012). Users' perception about e-books in India.DESIDOC Journal of Library ‎and Information Technology, 32 (2), 86-94.‎

Reid, C. (2002a). E-book users surveyed online, in college. Publishers Weekly, 249 (36), 12.‎

Reid, C. (2002b). Survey shows steady growth in e-book sales. Publishers Weekly, 249 (30), ‎‎19.‎

Report Gauges E-book Market. (2010). Publishers Weekly, 257 (3), 5.‎

Sadeghi, M. (2004).Induction and causality.HekmateSinavi, 8 (26/27), 10-24.‎

Sadeghi, R. (2010). Criticisms of popper and falsifiability problems.Ma'refateFalsafi, 8 (2), ‎‎125-150.‎

SadeghzadehGhamsari, F. (2007). Sciences and metaphysics boundaries as determined by ‎falsifiability. HekmateSinavi, 11 (36/37), 56-93.‎

Shaghool, Y., &Mahoozi, R. (2008).Beauty and induction in Kant's Philosophy.FalsafeyeDin , ‎‎6 (1), 53-68.‎

Sheikh Rezaie, H., &Dabbagh, S. (2008). Laws of nature, causality and induction in ‎tractatus.Falsafeye Din, 6 (2), 95-120.‎

Shelburne, W.A. (2009). E-book usage in an academic library: User attitudes and ‎behaviors.Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 33 (2/3), 59-72.‎

ShojaieShakoori, M. (2006). Falsifiability criticized. Ma'refateFalsafi, 4 (2), 147-174.‎

Shrimplin, A.K., Revelle, A., Hurst, S., & Messner, K. (2011). Contradictions and consensus ‎‎-- Clusters of opinions on e-books.College and Research Libraries, 72 (2), 181-190.‎

Simon, C. (2011). Just the facts: An examination of e-book usage by business students and ‎faculty. Reference Librarian, 52 (3), 263-273.‎

Slater, R. (2009). E-books or print books, big deals or local selections—what gets more use? ‎Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 33 (1), 31-41.‎

Slater, R. (2010). Why aren't e-books gaining more ground in academic libraries? E-book use ‎and perceptions: A review of published literature and research. Journal of Web ‎Librarianship, 4 (4), 305-331.‎

Soules, A. (2009). E-books and user assumptions.Serials, 22 (3), 1-5.‎

Springen , K. (2012). Are teens embracing e-books? Publishers Weekly, 259 (8), 20-23.‎

Students and E-Books by the Numbers. (2010). Publishers Weekly, 257 (43), 6‎

Study Challenges E-book Usage Assumptions. (2008). Research Information,39, 8.‎

Takahiro, F., & Akira, N. (2011).E-book market and user behavior, Affected by new ‎device.Journal of Information Processing and Management, 54 (2), 63-72.‎

Tavakkoli, K. (1999). The role of francis bacon in european renaissance. Chista,162/163, 226-‎‎234.‎

The Guardian. (2012). Jonathan Franzen Warns e-books are corroding values. Retrieved from ‎http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/jan/30/jonathan-franzen-ebooks-values.‎

Van Der Weel, A. (2010). E-roads and I-ways: A socio-technical look at user acceptance of e-‎books. LOGOS: The Journal of the World Book Community, 21 (3/4), 47-57.‎

Wagner, D.P. (2010). The rise of the e-book and the slow death of the printed book - How we ‎read now.Retrieved from http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Rise-of-the-E-Book-and-the-Slow-‎Death-of-the-Printed-Book---How-We-Read-Now&id=3507723.‎

Weinstein, A. (2010). A look at global expansion for e-books.Publishing Research Quarterly, ‎‎26 (1), 11-15.‎

Wu, M.D., & Shih-Chuan, C. (2011).Graduate students' usage of and attitudes towards e-‎books: Experiences from Taiwan.Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, ‎‎45 (3), 294-307.‎

Yarow, J. (2012). The death of printed books.Business Insider.Retrieved from ‎http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-04-05/tech/31292176_1_e-books-print-books-‎friends.‎

Zhang, Y., & Beckman, R. (2011). E-book usage among chemists, biochemists and ‎biologists: Findings of a survey and interviews. Issues in Science and Technology ‎Librarianship,65.Retrieved from http://www.istl.org/ll-spring/article2.html


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



E-ISSN: 2008-8310

   ISSN: 2008-8302