Constraints in journal publishing and international research collaboration in the Asia Pacific Region

Wah Yun Low, Wen Ting Tong, Veenah Gunasegaran

Abstract


International research collaboration is when researchers from various nations working together to achieve the common goal of producing new scientific knowledge and internationally co-authored papers are used to measure collaborative international research activity. The benefits of international research collaboration includes sharing of developed scientific knowledge and skills, and improve research quality, while in terms of collaborative journal publishing, it could contribute to publications in high impact journals and, increase the citation and visibility of researchers. International collaborative research activity and publishing is beneficial particularly to low-resources countries such as those in the Asia Pacific region. However, Asia Pacific region holds multi-ethnic, multi-cultural, populous, poor and growing ageing populations and these factors posed limitations to international research collaboration and journal publishing such as: lack of resources in terms of financial, institutional and government support; geographical distance; language barrier; lack of research skills; the challenge of acceptance into international journals; the lack of journals which represent the Asia Pacific region and lastly issues in managing the journals including financial, establishing a peer review and journal management, and operation guidelines. Efforts to address the challenges and promote journal publishing and international research collaboration in the region are warranted. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Asian Development Bank. (2014). Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2014 - Economy and output. Retrieved from http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/43030/ ki2014-rt-economy-output.pdf (accessed 21 January, 2015).

Beaver, D. d., & Rosen, R. (1979). Studies in scientific collaboration Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(3), 231-245.

Brennan, C. (2013). A bridge across the Arafura: Growing autsralia-Indonesian research collaboration in the Asian country. Retreived from https://go8.edu.au/sites/default/files/ docs/a_bridge_across_the_arafura_-_growing_australian-indonesian_research_collaboration_in_the_asian_century.pdf

de Solla Price, D. J. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press (accessed 12 February, 2015).

Doré, J. C., Ojasoo, T., Okubo, Y., Durand, T., Dudognon, G., & Miquel, J. F. (1996). Correspondence factor analysis of the publication patterns of 48 countries over the period 1981–1992. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(8), 588-602.

Firestone, W., & Dawson, J. (1988). Approaches to qualitative data analysis: intuitive procedural and intersubjective. In D. Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education, The Silent Scientific Revolution. New York: Praeger.

Freshwater, D., Sherwood, G., & Drury, V. (2006). International research collaboration: Issues, benefits and challenges of the global network. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(4), 295-303.

Fu, C. C., Lee, M. C., Chen, J. D., Chiou, J. Y., & Tai, T. Y. (1997). Influencing Factors on Research Activity and Productivity of Faculties of Family Medicine Residency Programs in Taiwan. Chiness Journal of Family Medicine, 7, 1-12.

Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115.

Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199-214.

Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39(5), 662-673.

Jahangir, G. Z. (2012). The Need of Research Culture in Pakistan.The Scientific Ravi,48-50. Retreived from http://www.gcu.edu.pk/Publications/SRavi/SRavi12/Chemistry.pdf (accessed January 20, 2015).

Jeong, S., Choi, J. Y., & Kim, J.-Y. (2013). On the drivers of international collaboration: The impact of informal communication, motivation, and research resources. Science and Public Policy, 41 (4), 520-531. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct079.

Jung, I., & Yoo, M. (2014). An analysis of Asia–Pacific educational technology research published internationally in 2000–2013. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(3), 355-365.

Kato, M., & Ando, A. (2013). The relationship between research performance and international collaboration in chemistry. Scientometrics, 97(3), 535-553.

Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.

Kim, K.-W. (2006). Measuring international research collaboration of peripheral countries: Taking the context into consideration. Scientometrics, 66(2), 231-240.

Low, W. Y., Ng, K. H., Kabir, M. A., Koh, A. P., & Sinnasamy, J. (2014). Trend and impact of international collaboration in clinical medicine papers published in Malaysia. Scientometrics, 100(2), http://dx.doi. 10.1007/s11192-013-1121-6

Low, W. Y., & Ng, K. H. (2011). International collaboration in journal publishing: enhancing quality and visibility. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 23(5), 649-650.

Mohrman, S. A., & Lawler, E. E. (2011). III. What we have learned. In M. S.A. & E. E. Lawler (Eds.), Useful Research (pp. 407-418). San Francisco, CA: Berett-Koehler Publishers.

Nadarajan, R. G. (2014). Transnational research collaboration: Foresight and holistic solutions. Research Digest,5:1-12.

Narin, F., & Whitlow, E. S. (1991).Measurement of scientific cooperation and coauthorship in CEC-related areas of science. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities Directorate-General Telecommunications, Information Industries and Innovation.

Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2003). Mitigating the Effects of Distance on Collaborative Intellectual Work. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 12(1), 27-42.

Peterson, M. F. (2001). International collaboration in organizational behavior research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(1), 59-81.

Peterson, M. F. (2009). Cross-cultural comparative studies and issues in international research collaboration. In D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 328-345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Prathap, G. (2013). Second order indicators for evaluating international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 95(2), 563-570.

Rynes, S. L. (2011). Counterpoint. In S. A. Mohrman & E. E. Lawler (Eds.), Useful Research (pp. 351-364). San Francisco, CA: Berett-Koehler Publishers.

Smith, M. (1958). The trend toward multiple authorship in psychology. American Psychologist, 13, 596-599.

Starr, S. L. (1995). Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology. New York: State University of New York Press.

Stefanie, H., Dirk, T., Gerold, H., & Gesa, B. (2011). Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia---Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view? Scientometrics, 86(3), 727-746.

Wagner, C. S. (2005). Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics, 62, 3-26.

Wagner, C. S., Yezril, A., & Hassell, S. (2000). International Cooperation in Research and Development An Update to an Inventory of U.S. Government Spending. California: RAND Corporation.

Wan, G., & Zhang, Y. (2011). ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 278. Between-Country Disparities in MDGs: The Asia and Pacific Region. Manila, Phillipines.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



E-ISSN: 2008-8310

   ISSN: 2008-8302