Open access policy

Mohammad Reza Ghane

Abstract


Scholarly communication as a social activity needs rethinking since this process is in the monopoly of commercial publishers. Authors and their institutions as well as librarians had been working to achieve unrestricted access to research output. In this regard, many researchers around the world gathered in Budapest on February 2002 to decide on global access to publications free of legal and price barriers. This campaign leads to issuing the declaration Budapest Open Access Initiative. This global and scientific gathering was the starting point for open access movement. This new paradigm in scholarly communication is discussed in this paper from price, legal, and business approaches. In relation to open access policies, “green and gold” routes as well as new licences in terms of Creative Commons are considered. Finally, I concluded that higher education institutes should provide suitable infrastructure to make researchers’ works accessible to others. At the same time, custodians of higher education have to legislate for new policies to mandate their researchers to publish the outputs in institutional and subject-based repositories.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact?. College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 372-382.

Bailey, Jr., C. W. (2008). Institutional repositories, tout de suite. Digital Scholarship. Retrieved from http://digital-scholarship.org/ts/irtoutsuite.pdf (accessed 15 September, 2015)

Bernius, S., & Hanauske, M. (2009). Open access to scientific literature: increasing citations as an incentive for authors to make their publications freely accessible. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS, January 5, 2009 - January 9, 2009. [Online]. Retrieved from:http://origin-www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2009/3450/00/07-07-09.pdf (accessed September 25, 2015).

Björk, B. c. (2014). Open access subject repositories: An overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 65(4): 698-706.

Björk, B.C. (2012). The Hybrid Model for Open Access Publication of Scholarly Articles – a Failed Experiment? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8): 1496-1504.

Budapest Open Access Initiative – BOAI (2002). Retrieved from http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read (accessed 12 June, 2015).

Burns, C. S.; Lana, A. & Budd, J. M. (2013). Institutional Repositories: Exploration of Costs and Value. D-Lib Magazine, 19(1/2). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib /january13/burns/01burns.html (accessed 12 September 2015).

Crow, R. (2009). Income models for open access: An overview of current practice. Retrieved from http://sparc.arl.org/sites/default/files/incomemodels_v1.pdf (accessed 3 October, 2015).

Hoorn, E. & van der Graaf, M. (2006). Copyright issues in open access research journals: the authors’ perspective. M-Lib Magazine, 12(2). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org /dlib/february06/vandergraaf/02vandergraaf.html (accessed 4 September, 2015).

Johnson, R. K. (2002). Institutional repositories: Partnering with Faculty to Enhance Scholarly Communication. D-Lib Magazine, 8(11). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org /dlib/november02/johnson/11johnson.html (accessed 12 September 2015).

Laakso, M. & Björk, B.C. (2013). Delayed Open Access – an Overlooked High-Impact Category of Openly Available Scientific Literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323-1329.

Odell, J.; Dill, E. & Palmer, K. (2014). Author’s rights to share scholarship: A survey of faculty attitudes and actions. Indianapolis: Indiana Library Federation. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/5932/facultyOAsurvey-ILF20141119c.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed 10 September, 2015).

Pappalardo, K. M., Fitzgerald, A. M., Fitzgerald, B. F., Kiel-Chisholm, S. D., O'Brien, D., & Austin, A. (2007). A guide to developing open access through your digital repository. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/9671/1/9671.pdf (accessed 3 October, 2015).

SHERPA/ROMEO (2006). Retrieved from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ (accessed 10 October 2015).

Suber, P. (2012). Open access. MIT :The MIT Press Essential Knowledge series. Retrieved from: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/hoap/Open_Access_%28the_book%29, (accessed 12 March, 2015).

Swan, A. (2012). Policy guidelines for the development and promotion of open access. UNESCO: France. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id= ptsR-DIXX-AC&oi=fnd&pg=PA4&dq=Policy+Guidelines+for+the+Development + and+Promotion+of+...&ots=4Bi07WQtxu&sig=eQSWWggHFOCsECmU57UHS2-TuN4#v=onepage&q= Policy% 20Guidelines%20for%20the% 20Development%20 and%20Promotion%20of%20...&f=false (accessed 3 October, 2015).

Swan, A, (2010). The open access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. Retrieved from: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/268516/2/Citation_advantage_paper.pdf (access 22 September, 2015).

TBI Communications (2014). Learned society attitudes towards open access: Report on survey results. Retrieved from http://www.edp-pen.org/images/stories/doc/EDP_ Society_Survey_May_2014_FINAL.pdf (accessed 16 September, 2015)

Van Nordoon, R. (2013). Researchers opt to limit uses of open-access publications. Nature, 6 February. doi:10.1038/nature.2013.12384

Waaijers, L. (2009). A brief overview of international trends in Open Access. Retrieved from http://www.kb.se/docs/about/projects/openaccess/international_trends_oa _leowaaijers.pdf (accessed 30 September, 2015).

Willinsky, J. (2009). The stratified economics of open access. Economic Analysis & Policy, 39(1): 53-70.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



E-ISSN: 2008-8310

   ISSN: 2008-8302